![]() Debian 6 (by Micah on 10:14:15 GMT from United States)Ĭomparing Debian 6 to openSUSE 11.3, the distro Debian replaced on all my machines, the difference is like night and day.As Jesse pointed out, Debian's graphical installer is pretty ordinary compared to Anaconda. In terms of a server distro, RHEL/CentOS at least backports some kernel updates for hardware compatability, as well as providing updates to Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice. It takes forever to push out a stable release and the final product is no more stable than other distros, yet seems a lot less polished. I've always found Debian stable to be underwhelming as well. Debian (by Pumpino on 10:01:06 GMT from Australia).It is very strange for distro which is claiming to be extremely stable. Yes,I also tried out Debian several times,and I am always broke into various problems. Debian (by pera on 09:52:45 GMT from Serbia).They do a professional job on both Debian and Ubuntu that can't be matched by there peers. Not some tatty unpolished Distro like most. Its based on testing and its a rolling release and does a better job + its got only about 1 years total dev take a look true Debian as it should be. Debian (by mandog on 09:51:32 GMT from United What are talking about Linux Mint does a True Debian version code named LMDE. ![]() Please don't compare Debian with Ubuntu, Mint or Fedora! And every time I found Debian to be a bit more modern than RHEL and the rebuilds, in all respects. ![]() I try every release of debian and compare the same with the contemporary RHEL and its clones such as Centos and Scientific. ![]() I found your review to be a bit biased for no reason.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |